Perhaps the most important and now widely accepted topic in a personalized curriculum, as well as in my useful national framework, is the relationship between a specialized curriculum and government-funded education. History has shown that this is generally not the case. There has been a lot of giving and taking or I could say a tightrope in terms of dissemination, science projects, education and personalized curricula involving the human trainers of those sections. sides of the island. Like me.
I have been in two science courses for over 20 years. I saw and felt like a full-time director of special curriculum programs, personalized curriculum students and their outstanding teachers. I am also in the Curriculum department dedicated to trying to get teachers to work admirably with my students who specialize in the curriculum by changing their standards, equipment, patience and humanity.
Similarly, I am a full-time teacher exhibiting class leaders with the ultimate goal of figuring out how best to work with some of the special curriculum teachers in my class as curriculum specialist students. In fact, I am unquestionably a dedicated curriculum coach working with certain distances from teachers and my personalized curriculum alternatives, and the number one advancement should be what these educators do. I can tell you right away that there is no middle ground between a specialist curriculum and a full-time education. I don’t see it happening effectively and consistently.
Anyway, what is a personalized curriculum? What makes it exceptional, confusing and controversial here and there? It claims to be attributed to such individuals as Jean-Marc Gaspard Ettard (1775-1838), the “chained” dove Aveyron and Anne Sullivan Macy (1866-1936), the breeder who “worked supernatural events” and Helen Keller.
Exceptional coaches show students with educational, numeracy, language, proficiency, numeracy, and / or cultural inequality. Royal assistants give instructions appropriate to the needs of each individual. These didactic exercises facilitate and make learning available to students who are in no way close to education due to disability.
Teachers are not the only ones who have participated in the wonderful educational history of this country. Physicians and the ministry, including those formerly known as Ettard, Edward O.Sgwen (1812-1880), Samuel Gridley Howe (1801-1876), and Thomas Hopkins Gallaudet (1787-1851), had to reduce contempt for ladies. individual. weak. Surprisingly, the teaching framework in this nation is generally ignored and corrupted in relation to student management in any capacity.
In fact there is, of course, a huge reading in our country that describes the treatment of disabled people in the mid-19th and 20th centuries. Unfortunately, in these accounts, as in reality, a portion of the disabled are regularly found in prisons and nursing homes without sufficient nutrition, clothing, individual hygiene and exercise.
To see examples of this kind of therapy in our writing, it is important to look no further than a Christmas song (1843) by Tiny Tim and Charles Dickens. Similarly, people with disabilities are regularly portrayed as retarded, such as Captain Hook and J.M. Barrie in 1911.
The basic thinking of the journalists of this period was that man should submit to disaster, as a kind of submission to the will of God, and in light of the fact that these things seem desperate for his greatness. People with unknown needs find it difficult to move forward these days with this view of society, our writing and our reasoning.